What Barriers Are Limiting Theranostics Adoption in Healthcare Systems?

Theranostics combines molecular imaging with targeted treatment, allowing clinicians to identify suitable patients and then treat the same biological target.

See What Is Happening Inside Companies And What It Means For Customers And Your Business. Download Sample: https://www.towardshealthcare.com/download-sample/6009

The approach is gaining momentum in prostate cancer and neuroendocrine tumors, but wider adoption is still constrained by infrastructure, isotope supply, specialist workforce, reimbursement and treatment capacity.

The biggest challenge is that theranostics requires an entire healthcare ecosystem, not simply an approved drug.

The 10 Biggest Adoption Barriers

Barrier What it means for healthcare systems Adoption impact
Infrastructure Requires nuclear medicine, imaging and radiation-shielded facilities High
Workforce Requires nuclear medicine physicians, physicists and radiopharmacists High
Radioisotope supply Lu-177 and Ac-225 require specialized production High
Logistics Radioactive products have limited usable time High
Treatment cost Drug + imaging + facilities + staffing increase total cost High
Reimbursement Multiple treatment and diagnostic components must be covered High
Patient selection Requires molecular imaging and target confirmation Medium–High
Geographic access Services are concentrated in specialist centers High
Regulation Pharmaceuticals and radioactive materials have overlapping requirements Medium–High
Clinical evidence Long-term evidence is still developing across indications Medium

1. Limited Nuclear Medicine Infrastructure

One of the biggest barriers is the availability of specialized treatment infrastructure.

Radioligand therapy may require:

  • Radiation-shielded treatment rooms
  • PET/CT or SPECT imaging
  • Nuclear medicine departments
  • Radiopharmacy facilities
  • Radiation monitoring
  • Specialized waste management
  • Qualified technologists and physicians

The International Atomic Energy Agency estimates that more than 10 million nuclear medicine procedures are performed globally each year, but access remains highly uneven between regions.

For hospitals, this means a therapy can receive regulatory approval without every healthcare system having the infrastructure needed to deliver it.

2. Shortage of Specialized Workforce

Theranostics requires a multidisciplinary workforce.

Key professionals include:

Nuclear medicine physicians | Medical physicists | Radiopharmacists | Nuclear medicine technologists | Oncologists | Dosimetrists | Radiation-safety specialists

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects nuclear medicine technologist employment to decline 1% from 2024–2034.

This creates a potential capacity problem as demand for radiopharmaceutical therapies grows.

Why workforce matters

A hospital may have the treatment room and isotope supply but still be unable to expand treatment volumes if it cannot recruit and retain trained specialists.

3. Radioisotope Supply Is a Critical Constraint

Theranostics depends heavily on medical radioisotopes including:

  • Lutetium-177
  • Actinium-225
  • Gallium-68
  • Iodine-131

The logistics are fundamentally different from conventional pharmaceuticals.

Isotope Approximate half-life Strategic relevance
Lu-177 6.65 days Established radioligand therapy
Ac-225 9.9 days High-interest alpha therapy
Ga-68 67.7 minutes Molecular imaging
I-131 8 days Established nuclear medicine applications

Because radioactive materials decay continuously, manufacturers and hospitals need reliable coordination between production, radiolabeling, quality control, transportation and administration.

Actinium-225 presents an additional challenge because production capacity remains limited relative to potential future demand.

4. High Total Treatment Costs

Theranostics should not be evaluated only on the price of the radiopharmaceutical.

Healthcare systems may also need:

  • PET/CT or SPECT scanners
  • Radiation-shielded rooms
  • Radiopharmacy infrastructure
  • Dosimetry
  • Additional staffing
  • Radiation monitoring
  • Patient management
  • Specialized transportation

This makes the total cost of ownership particularly important for hospitals.

5. Reimbursement Remains Complex

Theranostics combines several healthcare services:

Diagnostic imaging + biomarker assessment + radiopharmaceutical + administration + monitoring

Each component may involve different reimbursement rules.

For U.S. providers, payment can vary according to:

  • Indication
  • Payer
  • Treatment setting
  • Drug
  • Administration requirements
  • Diagnostic services

Uncertain reimbursement can therefore delay infrastructure investment.

6. Patient Selection Requires Molecular Imaging

Theranostics works by identifying a biological target and then treating that target.

Examples include:

PSMA imaging → PSMA-targeted therapy

Somatostatin receptor imaging → targeted radioligand therapy

Patients therefore need accurate molecular imaging before treatment.

If PET imaging capacity is limited, the diagnostic step itself can become a bottleneck.

7. Geographic Access Is Uneven

Theranostics is currently concentrated in specialized cancer and academic centers.

Access can be more difficult for:

  • Rural patients
  • Community hospitals
  • Lower-income healthcare systems
  • Countries with limited nuclear medicine infrastructure

Patients may therefore need to travel significant distances for diagnosis and treatment.

8. Regulatory Complexity

Theranostics operates at the intersection of several regulatory areas.

Healthcare organizations may need to manage requirements covering:

  • Pharmaceutical products
  • Radiopharmaceutical manufacturing
  • Radioactive materials
  • Radiation safety
  • Medical imaging
  • GMP
  • Transportation

This can make commercialization and implementation more complicated than conventional medicines.

9. Clinical Evidence Is Strongest in Selected Cancers

The clinical case for theranostics has strengthened significantly in prostate cancer and neuroendocrine tumors.

Key clinical evidence

Study Therapy Patients Key result
VISION Lu-177-PSMA-617 831 38% reduction in risk of death
NETTER-1 Lu-177 DOTATATE 229 Significant progression-free survival benefit

The Phase III VISION trial demonstrated that Lu-177-PSMA-617 plus standard care reduced the risk of death by 38% versus standard care alone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

However, evidence remains less mature for many emerging targets and indications.

Healthcare systems therefore need to distinguish between established clinical evidence and emerging applications.

10. Treatment Capacity Can Become the Next Bottleneck

As more patients become eligible, hospitals may face capacity constraints involving:

  • Treatment rooms
  • Imaging slots
  • Radiopharmacy throughput
  • Isotope availability
  • Specialist staffing
  • Patient scheduling
  • Radiation-safety procedures

This creates an important strategic issue:

Growing demand does not automatically translate into growing treatment volumes.

Capacity has to grow at the same time.

Who Is Affected by These Barriers?

Stakeholder Main challenge
Hospitals Infrastructure, staffing and capital investment
Oncologists Treatment pathways and patient selection
Nuclear medicine departments Capacity and isotope availability
Pharma companies Manufacturing and isotope supply
Radiopharmaceutical manufacturers Production and short half-lives
Payers Demonstrating clinical and economic value
Patients Availability, travel and waiting times
Investors Infrastructure and commercial scalability

What Is Changing in 2025–2026?

Investment is increasingly moving toward:

  • Radioligand therapy
  • Actinium-225 production
  • Lutetium-177 manufacturing
  • Molecular imaging
  • Automated radiopharmacy
  • Radiopharmaceutical CDMOs
  • Dosimetry technology
  • Personalized treatment planning

Large pharmaceutical companies are also expanding radiopharmaceutical strategies through M&A, licensing, partnerships and internal R&D.

This means competitive advantage may increasingly depend on supply-chain security and treatment infrastructure, not just pipeline quality.

What Should Healthcare Systems Track?

Healthcare organizations evaluating theranostics should monitor:

  • Eligible patient populations
  • PET/CT availability
  • Treatment-room capacity
  • Isotope supply
  • Radiopharmacy capacity
  • Specialist workforce
  • Reimbursement
  • Treatment economics
  • Clinical evidence
  • Regional referral networks

A Practical Readiness Framework

Readiness area Key question
Patients How many eligible patients can we treat annually?
Diagnostics Can we perform molecular imaging at sufficient volume?
Infrastructure Do we have appropriate treatment rooms?
Isotopes Can we secure reliable long-term supply?
Workforce Do we have trained specialists?
Economics Is reimbursement sufficient to support treatment?
Logistics Can short-lived products reach patients on schedule?
Evidence Which indications have the strongest clinical support?
Referrals Can eligible patients be identified efficiently?
Scalability Can today’s infrastructure support future therapies?

The Strategic Takeaway

Theranostics is moving from a specialized technology toward a potentially important component of precision oncology.

The clinical evidence is strongest in selected cancers, while investment is expanding across radioligands, isotope production, imaging and manufacturing.

But widespread adoption will depend on solving the delivery challenge.

The key question for healthcare systems is:

Can we build the infrastructure, workforce, isotope supply, reimbursement model and referral network required to deliver theranostics at scale?

Towards Healthcare Research & Consulting helps pharmaceutical companies, healthcare providers and investors track theranostic pipelines, clinical trials, radiopharmaceutical manufacturing, isotope supply, facilities, investments, partnerships, reimbursement and regional adoption.

Connect with us for complete guidance or further enquiry at [email protected]

Europe Region – +44 778 256 0738

North America Region – +1 8044 4193 44

APAC Region: +91 9356 9282 04

Visit Our Website: https://www.towardshealthcare.com

Find us on social platforms: LinkedInTwitterInstagram | Medium

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top